On Apr 26, 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> The testcase uses _Float128, what code that
> generates should not depend on your long double setting.
Good, that means my hunch that it shouldn't is on the right track.
> Please file a PR instead?
I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
Hi!
Please don't send patches as replies.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:33:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > * gcc.target/powerpr/pr79004.c: Add -mlong-double-128.
>
> Just like pr79004, float128-hw.c requires -mlong-double-128 for some
> the e
On Apr 14, 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpr/pr79004.c: Add -mlong-double-128.
Just like pr79004, float128-hw.c requires -mlong-double-128 for some
the expected asm opcodes to be output on target variants that have
64-bit long doubles. That's because their expanders,
e.g