On 5/24/2022 2:45 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
PING^1
On 5/12/22 09:10, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/11/22 20:49, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 16:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
In case where we have 2 equally good candidates like
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=
-Wtrivial-auto-var-init
for -f
PING^1
On 5/12/22 09:10, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/11/22 20:49, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 16:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> In case where we have 2 equally good candidates like
>>> -ftrivial-auto-var-init=
>>> -Wtrivial-auto-var-init
>>>
>>> for -ftrivial-auto-var-init, we
;s a difference in the trailing sign
char.
> What if both the candidate and the
> current best both add a trailing equal sign?
Then there's a difference somewhere else, and we would follow edit_distance_t.
>
> I find the array access of the final character suspicious - is there
&g
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:50 PM David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 16:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > In case where we have 2 equally good candidates like
> > -ftrivial-auto-var-init=
> > -Wtrivial-auto-var-init
> >
> > for -ftrivial-auto-var-init, we should take the
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 16:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> In case where we have 2 equally good candidates like
> -ftrivial-auto-var-init=
> -Wtrivial-auto-var-init
>
> for -ftrivial-auto-var-init, we should take the candidate that
> has a difference in trailing sign symbol.
>
> Patch can bootstrap
In case where we have 2 equally good candidates like
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=
-Wtrivial-auto-var-init
for -ftrivial-auto-var-init, we should take the candidate that
has a difference in trailing sign symbol.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be instal
