On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:41 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > I think with the 2) patch I achieve what we want for Fortran, for 1)
> > > the only behavior from gcc 11 is that
> > > -fsanitize-coverage=trace-cmp,trace-cmp is now reje
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think with the 2) patch I achieve what we want for Fortran, for 1)
> > the only behavior from gcc 11 is that
> > -fsanitize-coverage=trace-cmp,trace-cmp is now rejected.
>
> But -fsanitize-coverage=trace-cmp -fsanitize-coverage=
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 1:48 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch is infrastructure support for at least 3 different
> options that need changes:
> 1) PR104158 talks about a regression with the -fsanitizer-coverage=
>option; in GCC 11 and older and on trunk p
Hi!
The following patch is infrastructure support for at least 3 different
options that need changes:
1) PR104158 talks about a regression with the -fsanitizer-coverage=
option; in GCC 11 and older and on trunk prior to r12-1177, this
option behaved similarly to -f{,no-}sanitizer{,-recover}=
