On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 14/10/2021 1:47 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > What I still miss is tests for the (proc_name : variant_name) syntax
> > in places where proc_name : is optional, but is supplied and is valid, like
> > e.g. in interface, or in subr
On 14/10/2021 1:47 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
What I still miss is tests for the (proc_name : variant_name) syntax
in places where proc_name : is optional, but is supplied and is valid, like
e.g. in interface, or in subroutine/function and where proc_name specifies
the name of the containing interf
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:04:59AM +0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> I have now dropped this. This affects test2 in
> gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-8.f90, which I have added a comment to.
Thanks.
> I have added Fortran-specific tests as
> gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-variant-15.f90 to declare-vari
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:39:01PM +0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
> @@ -11599,8 +11599,11 @@ omp_construct_selector_matches (enum tree_code
> *constructs, int nconstructs,
> }
> }
>if (!target_seen
> - && lookup_attribute ("omp dec
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:39:01PM +0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> In secion 2.3.1 of the OpenMP 5.0 spec, it says:
>
> 3. For functions within a declare target block, the target trait is added to
> the beginning of the set...
>
> But OpenMP in Fortran doesn't have the notion of a declare targe
