Hi all,
as discussed below/in this thread, the reset of the diagnostic
contest affects the output with ENABLE_OFFLOAD. The attached
patch now uses [Ww]arning in dg-bogus.
It might be possible to reduce the differences between
ENABLE_OFFLOAD being true or false, but it does not seem to
be simple
On 26.04.21 21:54, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On 2021-04-26T14:32:10+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
first, can you add an entry regarding this flag
to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ?
Is that a standard thing that all new command-line flags do get
highlighted there? (I wouldn't have consider
On 26.04.21 14:32, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Secondly, I now see FAILs like:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/classify-serial.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
[...]
Now fixed myself to reduce the clutter.
Committed as r12-130-g5a26ba75de623f75fb44cddc2a9c982d31c96213
Tobias
-
Mentor Gra
Hi!
On 2021-04-26T14:32:10+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> first, can you add an entry regarding this flag
> to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ?
Is that a standard thing that all new command-line flags do get
highlighted there? (I wouldn't have considered that one important
enough?)
> S
Hi Thomas,
first, can you add an entry regarding this flag
to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html ?
Secondly, I now see FAILs like:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/classify-serial.f95 -O (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
gfortran.dg/goacc/classify-serial.f95:20:132: Warning: region contain
Hi!
On 2021-02-26T04:21:54-0800, Julian Brown wrote:
> This patch adds warnings for strange partitioning choices -- specifying
> either more or fewer partitioning levels on a parallel directive than the
> enclosed offload region actually uses.
Thanks!
> We've used a version of this patch on the
This patch adds warnings for strange partitioning choices -- specifying
either more or fewer partitioning levels on a parallel directive than the
enclosed offload region actually uses.
We've used a version of this patch on the og8/og9/og10 branches for
quite a while. Versions have been posted for
