Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-06-14 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 12/06/2019 17:19, co...@sdf.org wrote: > I think copyright assignment is done. Thanks for bearing with me. > > I noticed the version I submitted in April is missing some changes we > discussed on October 2018. > > I took the patch from then and removed -matpcs too, the unnecessary > change to

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-06-12 Thread coypu
I think copyright assignment is done. Thanks for bearing with me. I noticed the version I submitted in April is missing some changes we discussed on October 2018. I took the patch from then and removed -matpcs too, the unnecessary change to libgcc t-netbsd (which is the OABI configuration anyway)

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread coypu
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:11:30PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 23/05/2019 17:01, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 23/05/2019 15:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >> On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >>> On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 23/05/2019 17:01, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 23/05/2019 15:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law w

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:12 PM Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >>> On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 23/05/2019 15:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 23/05/2019 15:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 20/05/2019 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a fe

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 4/9/19 10:36 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: >>> Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have >>> less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a few and new releases >>> can become painful!)

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-10 Thread coypu
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:44:28AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > I was hoping to get a comment from one of the netbsd port maintainers on > the changes to the common NetBSD code. Are they no-longer active? Jason Thorpe said he can't contribute to GCC because of where he works. Krister

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-10 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 10/05/2019 00:33, co...@sdf.org wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> So we're well into stage4 which means technically it's too late for >>> something like this. However, given it's limited scope I won't object >>> if the ARM port maintainers wa

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-05-09 Thread coypu
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > So we're well into stage4 which means technically it's too late for > > something like this. However, given it's limited scope I won't object > > if the ARM port maintainers want to go forward. Otherwise I'll queue it >

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-04-09 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 09/04/2019 16:04, Jeff Law wrote: > On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: >> Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have >> less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a few and new releases >> can become painful!) >> >> gcc/ChangeLog >> >> config.gcc (arm*-*-netbsdelf*)

Re: [PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-04-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 4/8/19 9:17 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have > less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a few and new releases > can become painful!) > > gcc/ChangeLog > > config.gcc (arm*-*-netbsdelf*) Add support for EABI configuration > config.

[PATCH] netbsd EABI support

2019-04-08 Thread coypu
Pinging again in the hope of getting the patch in, I'd like to have less outstanding patches :) (I have quite a few and new releases can become painful!) gcc/ChangeLog config.gcc (arm*-*-netbsdelf*) Add support for EABI configuration config.host (arm*-*-netbsd*): Build driver-arm.o config/arm/net