On 4/15/24 8:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
cppcheck apparently warns on the | !!sticky part of the expression and
using | (!!sticky) quiets it up (it is correct as is).
The following patch adds the ()s, and also adds them around mant >> 1 just
in case it makes it clearer to all readers that
Hi!
cppcheck apparently warns on the | !!sticky part of the expression and
using | (!!sticky) quiets it up (it is correct as is).
The following patch adds the ()s, and also adds them around mant >> 1 just
in case it makes it clearer to all readers that the expression is parsed
that way already.
O
