Hi Iain, hello world,
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On 2024-01-16T15:00:16+, Iain Sandoe wrote:
...
diff --git a/gcc/lto-section-names.h b/gcc/lto-section-names.h
index a743deb4efb..1cdadf36ec0 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-section-names.h
+++ b/gcc/lto-section-names.h
...
@@ -35,8 +39,14 @@ extern con
Hi Thomas,
> On 29 Feb 2024, at 14:37, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On 2024-01-16T15:00:16+, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Currently, these section names have wrong syntax for Mach-O.
>> Although they were added some time ago; recently added tests are
>> now emitting them leading to new fails on Darwin
Hi Iain!
On 2024-01-16T15:00:16+, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Currently, these section names have wrong syntax for Mach-O.
> Although they were added some time ago; recently added tests are
> now emitting them leading to new fails on Darwin.
>
> This adds a Mach-O variant for each.
> gcc/lto-secti
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:00 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64 Darwin, x86_64 Linux.
> OK for trunk? When?
OK now.
> thanks
> Iain
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> Currently, these section names have wrong syntax for Mach-O.
> Although they were added some time ago; recently added tests are
> now em
Tested on x86_64 Darwin, x86_64 Linux.
OK for trunk? When?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
Currently, these section names have wrong syntax for Mach-O.
Although they were added some time ago; recently added tests are
now emitting them leading to new fails on Darwin.
This adds a Mach-O variant for each.