Re: [PATCH] lower-bitint: Don't use m_loads for loads used in GIMPLE_ASM [PR113464]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Like for GIMPLE_PHIs or calls, even for GIMPLE_ASMs we want > a corresponding VAR_DECL assigned for lhs SSA_NAMEs of loads > from memory, as even GIMPLE_ASM relies on those VAR_DECLs to exist. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686

[PATCH] lower-bitint: Don't use m_loads for loads used in GIMPLE_ASM [PR113464]

Hi! Like for GIMPLE_PHIs or calls, even for GIMPLE_ASMs we want a corresponding VAR_DECL assigned for lhs SSA_NAMEs of loads from memory, as even GIMPLE_ASM relies on those VAR_DECLs to exist. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2024-01-19 Jakub Jelinek