On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:39 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> In g:62acc72a957b5614 I'd stopped the unroller from using
> an epilogue loop in cases where the iteration count was
> known to be a multiple of the unroll factor. The epilogue
> and non-epilogue cases still shared this (p
In g:62acc72a957b5614 I'd stopped the unroller from using
an epilogue loop in cases where the iteration count was
known to be a multiple of the unroll factor. The epilogue
and non-epilogue cases still shared this (preexisting) code
to update the edge frequencies:
basic_block exit_bb = single_pr