On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 11:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > On 08/01/2025 11:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > +#ifndef _GLIBCXX26_CONSTEXPR
> > > > +# if __cplusplus >= 202303L
> > > Shouldn't that be 202400L instead? I mean that is
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 08/01/2025 11:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > +#ifndef _GLIBCXX26_CONSTEXPR
> > > +# if __cplusplus >= 202303L
> > Shouldn't that be 202400L instead? I mean that is what
> > -std=c++26/-std=gnu++26 predefines and has been histo
On 08/01/2025 11:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+#ifndef _GLIBCXX26_CONSTEXPR
+# if __cplusplus >= 202303L
Shouldn't that be 202400L instead? I mean that is what
-std=c++26/-std=gnu++26 predefines and has been historically what we've been
using for next version.
I think clang++ also predefines 202
5daf671c6da929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Giuseppe D'Angelo
> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 12:12:29 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: add a constexpr macro for C++26
>
> Following the precedent of _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR.
> It will be used to decorate some functions which hav
2:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: add a constexpr macro for C++26
Following the precedent of _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR.
It will be used to decorate some functions which have been made
constexpr in C++26 (for instance P2562R1, and maybe P3508R0, P3369R0,
...).
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits
