Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Use ///< for inline documentation

2022-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 10:29, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > On Monday, 3 October 2022 10:37:00 CEST Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I did look into this after you pointed it out on IRC. Unless I fumbled > > my doxygen roll, the results are the same for /// and ///< so maybe > > at some point Doxygen started

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Use ///< for inline documentation

2022-10-03 Thread Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
On Monday, 3 October 2022 10:37:00 CEST Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I did look into this after you pointed it out on IRC. Unless I fumbled > my doxygen roll, the results are the same for /// and ///< so maybe > at some point Doxygen started to DTRT even without the < character. It is actually unchang

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Use ///< for inline documentation

2022-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 19:43, Arsen Arsenović via Libstdc++ wrote: > > I accidentally that some variables were misdocumented when using > trailing comment for documentation. I ran a search with a relatively > simple regex[1] to look for any ///s following some code that did not > have a <, and cam

[PATCH] libstdc++: Use ///< for inline documentation

2022-10-01 Thread Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
I accidentally that some variables were misdocumented when using trailing comment for documentation. I ran a search with a relatively simple regex[1] to look for any ///s following some code that did not have a <, and came up with these instances only. [1]: \s*([^ ]+\s*)+///[^<].*$ libstdc++-v3