On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 6:58 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Currently we only provide std::abs(__int128) and std::abs(__float128)
> for non-strict modes, i.e. -std=gnu++NN but not -std=c++NN.
>
> This defines those overloads for strict modes too, as a small step
> towards resolving PR 96710 (which w
Currently we only provide std::abs(__int128) and std::abs(__float128)
for non-strict modes, i.e. -std=gnu++NN but not -std=c++NN.
This defines those overloads for strict modes too, as a small step
towards resolving PR 96710 (which will eventually mean that __int128
satisfies the std::integral conc
