Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Replace use of incorrect non-temporal store

2023-06-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 13:26, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > OK for master and backports? > OK for trunk and branches > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > > - >8 - > > The call to the base implementation sometimes didn't find a matching > signature because t

[PATCH] libstdc++: Replace use of incorrect non-temporal store

2023-06-06 Thread Matthias Kretz via Gcc-patches
OK for master and backports? Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu - >8 - The call to the base implementation sometimes didn't find a matching signature because the _Abi parameter of _SimdImpl* was "wrong" after conversion. It has to call into ::_SimdImpl instead of the current ABI tag's _SimdIm