On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 15:03, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
OK, thanks.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> Even though iterator is a reserved macro name, we can't use it as the
> name of this implementation detail type since it could introduce name
> lookup a
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Even though iterator is a reserved macro name, we can't use it as the
name of this implementation detail type since it could introduce name
lookup ambiguity in valid code, e.g.
struct A { using iterator = void; }
struct B :
