Committed to trunk, backported to releases/gcc-11.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:22 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 17:40, Thomas Rodgers via Libstdc++
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > PR102994 "atomics: std::atomic::wait is not marked const" raises the
> > issue that the current libstdc++
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 17:40, Thomas Rodgers via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
>
> PR102994 "atomics: std::atomic::wait is not marked const" raises the
> issue that the current libstdc++ implementation marks the notify members
> const, the implementation strategy used by libstdc++, as well as libc++
> and t
to account for change in notify_one/notify_all signature.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
From 7ed6dfae5a0a7a9e56291d780e44f99d644847e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Rodgers
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:55:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Make atomic notify_one and notify_all non-const
