On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 22:16, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> Btw, any thoughts on PR105611 which reports std::shift_left/right's use
> of the three-parameter version of ranges::next (on legacy iterators) is
> sketchy? Should we define a th
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
Btw, any thoughts on PR105611 which reports std::shift_left/right's use
of the three-parameter version of ranges::next (on legacy iterators) is
sketchy? Should we define a three-parameter std::__next analog for
legacy iterators and use t