> Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and
> i686-linux). Ok for trunk?
>
> dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite,
> so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were wrong and resulted
> in no matches.
Looks good to me (but ca
On 22 January 2013 17:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and
> i686-linux). Ok for trunk?
OK, thanks.
> dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite,
> so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were w
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:05:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:06:05PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 2013-01-12 Andi Kleen
> > Jonathan Wakely
> >
> > PR libstdc++/55223
> > * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
> >
