On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 03:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and
> > > perhaps 13?
OK for trunk and 14 and 13.
> > >
> > > N.B. the use of
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:55 AM Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and
> > > perhaps 13?
> > >
> > > N.B. the use of a constrained auto instead of
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and
> > perhaps 13?
> >
> > N.B. the use of a constrained auto instead of a separate static_assert
> > in the testcase is unfortunate but I op
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and
> perhaps 13?
>
> N.B. the use of a constrained auto instead of a separate static_assert
> in the testcase is unfortunate but I opted for local consistency for
> now.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> U
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and
perhaps 13?
N.B. the use of a constrained auto instead of a separate static_assert
in the testcase is unfortunate but I opted for local consistency for
now.
-- >8 --
Unlike for span and empty_view, the range_reference_t of
ref_vie
