Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix gnu.ver CXXABI_1.3.16 for Solaris [PR118701]

2025-02-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Feb 04 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I think this will cause check-abi failures on risc-v because the new > symbols are added to CXXABI_1.3.16 but the "latest_p" map says that > new symbols (i.e. ones not present in the baseline_symbols.txt file) > should be in CXXABI_1.3.15 There is effectiv

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix gnu.ver CXXABI_1.3.16 for Solaris [PR118701]

2025-02-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 14:19, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Feb 04 2025, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > I think this will cause check-abi failures on risc-v because the new > > symbols are added to CXXABI_1.3.16 but the "latest_p" map says that > > new symbols (i.e. ones not present in the baseline_sy

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix gnu.ver CXXABI_1.3.16 for Solaris [PR118701]

2025-02-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 12:48, Rainer Orth wrote: > > This patch > > commit c6977f765838a5ca8d321d916221a7368622bdd9 > Author: Andreas Schwab > Date: Tue Jan 21 23:50:15 2025 +0100 > > libstdc++: correct symbol version of typeinfo for bfloat16_t on RISC-V > > broke the libstdc++-abi/abi_check

[PATCH] libstdc++: Fix gnu.ver CXXABI_1.3.16 for Solaris [PR118701]

2025-02-04 Thread Rainer Orth
This patch commit c6977f765838a5ca8d321d916221a7368622bdd9 Author: Andreas Schwab Date: Tue Jan 21 23:50:15 2025 +0100 libstdc++: correct symbol version of typeinfo for bfloat16_t on RISC-V broke the libstdc++-abi/abi_check test on Solaris: the log shows 1 incompatible symbols 0 Argument