Thanks Jonathan!
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:51 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I thought I'd CC'd Maged on this patch, but apparently not. I've
> pushed it to trunk now.
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 13:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > Tested powerpc64le-linux. Does anybody see a problem with this cha
I thought I'd CC'd Maged on this patch, but apparently not. I've
pushed it to trunk now.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 13:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux. Does anybody see a problem with this change?
>
>
> The non-atomic store that sets both reference counts to zero uses a
> type-
Tested powerpc64le-linux. Does anybody see a problem with this change?
The non-atomic store that sets both reference counts to zero uses a
type-punned pointer, which has undefined behaviour. We could use memset
to write 8 bytes, but we don't actually need it to be a single store
anyway. No other
