On Sat, 14 Sept 2024 at 15:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Sept 2024 at 10:39, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> >
> > Jonathan Wakely writes:
> >
> > > This restores support for most of with -ffreestanding. In case
> > > there are users who want a minimal freestanding implementation that only
On Sat, 14 Sept 2024 at 10:39, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
> > This restores support for most of with -ffreestanding. In case
> > there are users who want a minimal freestanding implementation that only
> > provides what the standard guarantees, there's a new macro that
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> This restores support for most of with -ffreestanding. In case
> there are users who want a minimal freestanding implementation that only
> provides what the standard guarantees, there's a new macro that disables
> again. This can be used to write more portable freesta
This restores support for most of with -ffreestanding. In case
there are users who want a minimal freestanding implementation that only
provides what the standard guarantees, there's a new macro that disables
again. This can be used to write more portable freestanding
code that doesn't rely on b
