Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Do not use 'not' alternative token in

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 15:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:59, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 1:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > > >> > This fixes: > >> > FAIL: 17_intro/hea

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Do not use 'not' alternative token in

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:59, Tomasz Kaminski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 1:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> > >> > This fixes: >> > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for >> > excess errors)

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Do not use 'not' alternative token in

2025-04-16 Thread Tomasz Kaminski
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 1:32 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > This fixes: > > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for > excess errors) > > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++26 (test

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Do not use 'not' alternative token in

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 12:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > This fixes: > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for > excess errors) > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for > excess errors) > > The purpose of 'not defined>' is to be

[PATCH] libstdc++: Do not use 'not' alternative token in

2025-04-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
This fixes: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++23 (test for excess errors) FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) The purpose of 'not defined>' is to be ill-formed (as required by [format.range.fmtkind]) and to give an err