Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Deprecate useless compatibility headers for C++17

On 31/10/24 20:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Tested x86_64-linux. Is the g++ test change OK? Also available for review at: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/4 -- >8 -- These headers make no sense for C++ programs, because they either define different content to the correspondi

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Deprecate useless compatibility headers for C++17

On 01/11/24 20:56 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 31/10/24 20:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Tested x86_64-linux. Is the g++ test change OK? Also available for review at: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/4 -- >8 -- These headers make no sense for C++ programs, because they e

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Deprecate useless compatibility headers for C++17

On 10/31/24 4:09 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Tested x86_64-linux. Is the g++ test change OK? Yes. Also available for review at: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/4 -- >8 -- These headers make no sense for C++ programs, because they either define different content to the corresp

[PATCH] libstdc++: Deprecate useless compatibility headers for C++17

Tested x86_64-linux. Is the g++ test change OK? Also available for review at: https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/4 -- >8 -- These headers make no sense for C++ programs, because they either define different content to the corresponding C header, or define nothing at all in namespac