On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 1:43 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> LWG 4229 points out that the std::ranges::to wording refers to class
> types, but I added an assertion using std::is_class_v which only allows
> non-union class types. LWG consensus is that unions should be allowed,
> so this additionally u
LWG 4229 points out that the std::ranges::to wording refers to class
types, but I added an assertion using std::is_class_v which only allows
non-union class types. LWG consensus is that unions should be allowed,
so this additionally uses std::is_union_v.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/
