On 11/5/21 16:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/5/21 16:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should we add __extension__ here?
I tried doing that but it didn't help me with the warning.
Maybe I did something wrong?
Works for me just fine say on:
void
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 8:25 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/5/21 16:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Should we add __extension__ here?
>
> I tried doing that but it didn't help me with the warning.
> Maybe I did something wrong?
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ cat y.cc
#include
#define uptr uintptr_t
# define GE
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/5/21 16:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Should we add __extension__ here?
>
> I tried doing that but it didn't help me with the warning.
> Maybe I did something wrong?
Works for me just fine say on:
void foo ()
{
int a = ({ int d = 1;
On 11/5/21 16:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should we add __extension__ here?
I tried doing that but it didn't help me with the warning.
Maybe I did something wrong?
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 8:00 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> The code uses intentionally braced-groups within expressions:
>
> ({\
Should we add __extension__ here?
>uptr pc;\
>asm("lea 0(%%rip), %0" : "=r"(pc)); \
>
The code uses intentionally braced-groups within expressions:
({\
uptr pc;\
asm("lea 0(%%rip), %0" : "=r"(pc)); \
pc; \
})
And we emit gazillion of warnings now:
/home/marxi
