On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 02:16:11PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> >>> But will they accept a patch to check a macro never set anywhere in and
> >>> irrelevant to LLVM? That's why I kept all in one patch, to be GCC-local.
> >>
> >> I meant the patch would be gcc local.
> >> But, for lat
Hi Jakub,
>>> But will they accept a patch to check a macro never set anywhere in and
>>> irrelevant to LLVM? That's why I kept all in one patch, to be GCC-local.
>>
>> I meant the patch would be gcc local.
>> But, for later we need only the changes to the imported files be in one
>> commit, not
Hi Jakub,
>> But will they accept a patch to check a macro never set anywhere in and
>> irrelevant to LLVM? That's why I kept all in one patch, to be GCC-local.
>
> I meant the patch would be gcc local.
> But, for later we need only the changes to the imported files be in one
> commit, not others
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> >> 2023-11-23 Rainer Orth
> >>
> >>libsanitizer:
> >>PR libsanitizer/112563
> >>* configure.ac (libsanitizer_cv_as_sym_assign): Check for
> >>assembler symbol assignment support.
> >>* configure, c
Hi Jakub,
>> 2023-11-23 Rainer Orth
>>
>> libsanitizer:
>> PR libsanitizer/112563
>> * configure.ac (libsanitizer_cv_as_sym_assign): Check for
>> assembler symbol assignment support.
>> * configure, config.h.in: Regenerate.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_redefine
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 01:56:46PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The recent libsanitizer import broke the build on Solaris/SPARC with the
> native as:
>
> /usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
> "__sanitizer_internal_memset" is used but not defined
> /usr/ccs/bin/as:
The recent libsanitizer import broke the build on Solaris/SPARC with the
native as:
/usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
"__sanitizer_internal_memset" is used but not defined
/usr/ccs/bin/as: ".libs/sanitizer_errno.s", line 4247: error: symbol
"__sanitizer_interna
