> Hi Lewis,
>
> Thanks! Good spot. I think it should be calling dg-runtest however,
> same as what libphobos.cycles/cycles.exp is doing. Could also fix the
> test name so each one is unique, just to hit two birds in one -
> something like the following would suffice (haven't had time to check).
>
Excerpts from Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches's message of Juli 14, 2022 11:53 pm:
> Hello-
>
> I get a different number of test results from libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp,
> depending on server load. I believe it's because this testsuite doesn't check
> runtest_file_p:
>
> $ make -j 1 RUNTESTFLAGS
Hello-
I get a different number of test results from libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp,
depending on server load. I believe it's because this testsuite doesn't check
runtest_file_p:
$ make -j 1 RUNTESTFLAGS='unittest.exp' check-target-libphobos | grep '^#'
# of expected passes 10
$ make
