On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:10 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 17:09 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:42:29PM -0400, David Malcolm via Binutils
> > wrote:
> > > Any objections, or is there a reason to keep these macros that I'm
> > > not aware of? (and did I
On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 17:09 +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:42:29PM -0400, David Malcolm via Binutils
> wrote:
> > Any objections, or is there a reason to keep these macros that I'm
> > not aware of? (and did I send this to all the pertinent lists?)
>
> No objection from me.
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:42:29PM -0400, David Malcolm via Binutils wrote:
> Any objections, or is there a reason to keep these macros that I'm
> not aware of? (and did I send this to all the pertinent lists?)
No objection from me. These macros are not used anywhere in
binutils-gdb.
--
Alan M
libiberty's ansidecl.h provides macros FINAL and OVERRIDE to allow
virtual functions to be labelled with the C++11 "final" and "override"
specifiers, but with empty implementations on pre-C++11 C++ compilers.
We've used the macros in many places in GCC, but as of as of GCC 11
onwards GCC has requi
