Re: [PATCH] libiberty: cleanup Makefile.in

2015-05-11 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Joseph Myers writes: > On Mon, 11 May 2015, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> +TARGETLIB_PIC = $(dir $(TARGETLIB))pic/$(notdir $(TARGETLIB)) >> +TARGETLIB_NOASAN = $(dir $(TARGETLIB))noasan/$(notdir $(TARGETLIB)) > > Is it OK to use GNU make features in libiberty now? That is, do binutils >

Re: [PATCH] libiberty: cleanup Makefile.in

2015-05-11 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > +TARGETLIB_PIC = $(dir $(TARGETLIB))pic/$(notdir $(TARGETLIB)) > +TARGETLIB_NOASAN = $(dir $(TARGETLIB))noasan/$(notdir $(TARGETLIB)) Is it OK to use GNU make features in libiberty now? That is, do binutils and GDB now require GNU make? --

[PATCH] libiberty: cleanup Makefile.in

2015-05-11 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
* maint-tool: Refactor pic/ and noasan/ handling. * Makefile.in: Likewise. Regenerate dependencies. --- It's hard to see which parts of libiberty get built with which flags due to the current way the checks for pic and noasan are performed. So push this decision to make(1). For t