Re: [PATCH] libiberty: Add support for 'in' and 'in ref' storage classes.

2020-08-25 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 13:32 +0200, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > This patch adds support for 'in' as a first-class storage class with its > own mangle symbol, of which also permits 'in ref'. Previously, 'in' was > an alias to 'const [scope]', which is a type constructor. > > The m

[PING][PATCH] libiberty: Add support for 'in' and 'in ref' storage classes.

2020-08-14 Thread Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
Ping. Though I will hold back on supporting 'in ref' until it has been formalized. Current discussions are around what value might it have over 'ref const scope' (so far, none). Iain. On 07/08/2020 13:32, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Hi, > > This patch adds support for 'in' as a first-class storage cla

[PATCH] libiberty: Add support for 'in' and 'in ref' storage classes.

2020-08-07 Thread Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
Hi, This patch adds support for 'in' as a first-class storage class with its own mangle symbol, of which also permits 'in ref'. Previously, 'in' was an alias to 'const [scope]', which is a type constructor. The mangle symbol repurposed for this is 'I', which was originally used by identifier typ