Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2024-06-26 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 10:56 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > Thanks for the review. > Here's the updated patch. Thanks for the update patch; sorry for the delay in reviewing. The updated patch looks good for trunk. Dave > > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 12:45 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Thu, 2023

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2024-02-21 Thread Antoni Boucher
gcc_jit_type_get_size (gcc_jit_context_get_type > > (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_DOUBLE)), sizeof (double)); > > +  CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_get_size (gcc_jit_context_get_type > > (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_BFLOAT16)), sizeof (__bfloat16)); > > > This is only going to wor

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2023-12-01 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 17:20 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > I forgot to attach the patch. > > On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 17:19 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > Hi. > > This patch adds the support for the type bfloat16 (bug 112574). > > > > This was asked to be splitted from a another patch sent here: >

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2023-12-01 Thread Antoni Boucher
David: ping. On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 17:20 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > I forgot to attach the patch. > > On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 17:19 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote: > > Hi. > > This patch adds the support for the type bfloat16 (bug 112574). > > > > This was asked to be splitted from a another patc

Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2023-11-16 Thread Antoni Boucher
> > Thanks for the review. From 0e57583bba7e9fe5f5ff89559d4f29bf1bd7a240 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoni Boucher Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:59:22 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16 gcc/jit/ChangeLog: PR jit/112574 * docs/topics/types.rst: Document

[PATCH] libgccjit: Add support for the type bfloat16

2023-11-16 Thread Antoni Boucher
Hi. This patch adds the support for the type bfloat16 (bug 112574). This was asked to be splitted from a another patch sent here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2023q1/001607.html Thanks for the review.