On Tue, 10 May 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase ICEs (and only without -g), because we don't replace
> one VEC_COND_EXPR with .VCOND* call.
> We don't do that because gimple_expand_vec_set_expr adds some stmts before
> *gsi and then uses gsi_remove to remove it. gsi_re
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs (and only without -g), because we don't replace
one VEC_COND_EXPR with .VCOND* call.
We don't do that because gimple_expand_vec_set_expr adds some stmts before
*gsi and then uses gsi_remove to remove it. gsi_remove moves the iterator
to the next stmt and in the cal
