Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-17 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 09 Nov 2022 01:52:12 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:00 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:40:10 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:01 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > >> The docs say we take ISA s

Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/7/22 11:58, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: at a bare minimum we've required lower case strings, but there's generally been some subtle differences as well in things like version handling and such. We talked about removing th

Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-09 Thread Philipp Tomsich
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 04:00, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:40:10 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:01 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > >> The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: > >> at a bare minimum we'

Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-09 Thread Christoph Müllner
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:00 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:40:10 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:01 PM Palmer Dabbelt > wrote: > > > >> The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: > >> at a bare minimu

Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-08 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 05:40:10 PST (-0800), christoph.muell...@vrull.eu wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:01 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: at a bare minimum we've required lower case strings, but there's generally been some subtle

Re: [PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-08 Thread Christoph Müllner
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:01 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: > at a bare minimum we've required lower case strings, but there's > generally been some subtle differences as well in things like version > handling and such. We talke

[PATCH] invoke: RISC-V's -march doesn't take ISA strings

2022-11-07 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
The docs say we take ISA strings, but that's never really been the case: at a bare minimum we've required lower case strings, but there's generally been some subtle differences as well in things like version handling and such. We talked about removing the lower case requirement in the last GNU too