On 8/27/21 5:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 8/26/2021 1:30 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble gett
On 8/26/2021 1:30 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the not
On 8/26/2021 1:00 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. T
Hello Nathan & Joern,
Richard has asked me to give you a heads up that we will be enabling
an informational note for all instances of the GCC -Wuninitialized
warning. You added the helpful note pretty much exactly 15 years ago
to the day (in http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=11656
On August 27, 2021 5:20:57 PM GMT+02:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
>On 8/27/21 12:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:30 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Ma
On 8/27/21 12:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:30 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble get
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 9:30 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
> >>> -Wuninitialized
On 8/26/21 10:38 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look int
On 8/26/21 1:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. The attached
patch si
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:03 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
> -Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
> variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. The attached
> patch simplifies the warn_uninit() function
On 8/25/21 5:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 8/25/2021 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. The attached
patch sim
On 8/25/2021 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. The attached
patch simplifies the warn_uninit() function t
Richard, some time ago you mentioned you'd had trouble getting
-Wuninitialized to print the note pointing to the uninitialized
variable. I said I'd look into it, and so I did. The attached
patch simplifies the warn_uninit() function to get rid of some
redundant cruft: besides a few pointless nul
13 matches
Mail list logo
