On 11/12/19 10:22 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Committed in r278098.
I thought I'd tested the kernel with the patch before and got
no warnings, so having rebuilt it again just now I'm surprised
to see the 16 instances below (7 of which are distinct). I'm
happy to report that none looks like a fals
On 10/31/19 10:31 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/8/19 5:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is a resubmission of the -Wrestrict implementation for
the sprintf family of functions. The original patch was posted
in 2017 but never approved. This revision makes only a few minor
changes to the original
On 10/8/19 5:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is a resubmission of the -Wrestrict implementation for
> the sprintf family of functions. The original patch was posted
> in 2017 but never approved. This revision makes only a few minor
> changes to the original code, mostly necessitated by reba
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00570.html
On 10/14/2019 08:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00570.html
On 10/8/19 5:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is a resubmission of the -Wrestrict implementation for
the sprintf family o
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00570.html
On 10/8/19 5:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is a resubmission of the -Wrestrict implementation for
the sprintf family of functions. The original patch was posted
in 2017 but never approved. This revision makes only a few minor
Attached is a resubmission of the -Wrestrict implementation for
the sprintf family of functions. The original patch was posted
in 2017 but never approved. This revision makes only a few minor
changes to the original code, mostly necessitated by rebasing on
the top of trunk.
The description from
