Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-05-11 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:50 AM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 5/11/22 10:27, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:19 AM Martin Liška wrote: > >> > >> On 5/2/22 09:57, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> On 3/31/22 09:01, Martin Liška wrote: > @Jakub: May I install it once stage1 opens? > >>

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-05-11 Thread Martin Liška
>> Survives i386.exp tests, may I install the patch after testing or >>>>>> is it a stage1 material? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> CCing Uros. >

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-05-11 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:19 AM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 5/2/22 09:57, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 3/31/22 09:01, Martin Liška wrote: > >> @Jakub: May I install it once stage1 opens? > > > > May I please ping this? > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Martin > >> > >> On 1/3/22

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-05-11 Thread Martin Liška
On 5/2/22 09:57, Martin Liška wrote: > On 3/31/22 09:01, Martin Liška wrote: >> @Jakub: May I install it once stage1 opens? > > May I please ping this? > > Thanks, > Martin > >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> >> On 1/3/22 12:43, Martin Liška wrote: >>> PING: Jakub? >>> >>> On 12/15/21 10:57, Martin Liš

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-05-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 3/31/22 09:01, Martin Liška wrote: > @Jakub: May I install it once stage1 opens? May I please ping this? Thanks, Martin > > Cheers, > Martin > > On 1/3/22 12:43, Martin Liška wrote: >> PING: Jakub? >> >> On 12/15/21 10:57, Martin Liška wrote: >>> On 12/14/21 17:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-03-31 Thread Martin Liška
@Jakub: May I install it once stage1 opens? Cheers, Martin On 1/3/22 12:43, Martin Liška wrote: PING: Jakub? On 12/15/21 10:57, Martin Liška wrote: On 12/14/21 17:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd use INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1 instead of 31.  Otherwise LGTM. Installed with that change, thanks. Moreove

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2022-01-03 Thread Martin Liška
PING: Jakub? On 12/15/21 10:57, Martin Liška wrote: On 12/14/21 17:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd use INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1 instead of 31.  Otherwise LGTM. Installed with that change, thanks. Moreover, I'm suggesting a simplification: The patch removes unneeded loops for cpu_features2 and CONVERT

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2021-12-17 Thread Martin Liška
On 12/16/21 21:58, Stefan Kneifel wrote: Am 15.12.21 um 10:57 schrieb Martin Liška: On 12/14/21 17:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd use INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1 instead of 31. Otherwise LGTM. Installed with that change, thanks. Moreover, I'm suggesting a simplification: The patch removes unneeded loop

Re: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2021-12-16 Thread Stefan Kneifel
Am 15.12.21 um 10:57 schrieb Martin Liška: On 12/14/21 17:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd use INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1 instead of 31. Otherwise LGTM. Installed with that change, thanks. Moreover, I'm suggesting a simplification: The patch removes unneeded loops for cpu_features2 and CONVERT_EXPR that

[PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling

2021-12-15 Thread Martin Liška
Survives i386.exp tests, may I install the patch after testing or is it a stage1 material? Thanks, MartinFrom 9fa89df81b3e6cb56f6ab59b0993168e7a048489 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:54:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling The pat