On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:39 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > IMO the correct low-effort fix is to save and restore recog_data
> > in ix86_vector_duplicate_value. It's a relatively big copy,
> > but the c
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:14:06AM +0100, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> IMO the correct low-effort fix is to save and restore recog_data
> in ix86_vector_duplicate_value. It's a relatively big copy,
> but the current code is pretty wasteful anyway (allocating at
> least a new SE
