On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> When we eliminate frame pointer, we should also replace frame pointer
>>> with stack pointer - UNITS_PER_WORD in debug insns. This patch f
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> When we eliminate frame pointer, we should also replace frame pointer
>> with stack pointer - UNITS_PER_WORD in debug insns. This patch fixed:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.c -Os li
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When we eliminate frame pointer, we should also replace frame pointer
> with stack pointer - UNITS_PER_WORD in debug insns. This patch fixed:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.c -Os line pr58791-5.c:20 b1 == 9
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When we eliminate frame pointer, we should also replace frame pointer
> with stack pointer - UNITS_PER_WORD in debug insns. This patch fixed:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.c -Os line pr58791-5.c:20 b1 == 9
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.
When we eliminate frame pointer, we should also replace frame pointer
with stack pointer - UNITS_PER_WORD in debug insns. This patch fixed:
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.c -Os line pr58791-5.c:20 b1 == 9
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-5.c -Os line pr58791-5.c:20 b2 == 73
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality