On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:46 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 7/14/21 1:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:27 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> An existing, previously xfailed test that I recently removed
> >> the xfail from made me realize that -Wstringop-
On 7/14/21 1:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:27 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
An existing, previously xfailed test that I recently removed
the xfail from made me realize that -Wstringop-overflow doesn't
properly detect buffer overflow resulting from vectorized s
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:27 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> An existing, previously xfailed test that I recently removed
> the xfail from made me realize that -Wstringop-overflow doesn't
> properly detect buffer overflow resulting from vectorized stores.
> Because of a difference in th
An existing, previously xfailed test that I recently removed
the xfail from made me realize that -Wstringop-overflow doesn't
properly detect buffer overflow resulting from vectorized stores.
Because of a difference in the IL the test passes on x86_64 but
fails on targets like aarch64. Other examp
