On 05/03/2017 08:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 05/03/2017 04:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, my fix for bug 79062 is only partial (it gets the pass
to run but the warnings are still not issued). I don't quite
understand what prevents the
On 05/03/2017 04:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, my fix for bug 79062 is only partial (it gets the pass
to run but the warnings are still not issued). I don't quite
understand what prevents the warning flag(s) from getting set
when -flto i
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, my fix for bug 79062 is only partial (it gets the pass
to run but the warnings are still not issued). I don't quite
understand what prevents the warning flag(s) from getting set
when -flto is used. This seems to be a b
FWIW, my fix for bug 79062 is only partial (it gets the pass
to run but the warnings are still not issued). I don't quite
understand what prevents the warning flag(s) from getting set
when -flto is used. This seems to be a bigger problem than
just the sprintf pass not doing something just right.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 09:55 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> On 04/25/2017 04:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by
On 04/27/2017 07:35 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 04/25/2017 09:55 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 04/25/2017 04:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I think I may have included the (partial) the fix for 79062 to
get some tests to pass but I'm not 100% sure.
The follow
On 04/25/2017 09:55 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 04/25/2017 04:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by gimple-fold.c transforming s{,n}printf
calls with a plain "%s" format string
On 04/25/2017 09:55 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 04/25/2017 04:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by gimple-fold.c transforming s{,n}printf
calls with a plain "%s" format string
On 04/25/2017 04:05 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by gimple-fold.c transforming s{,n}printf
calls with a plain "%s" format string into strcpy regardless of
whether they are va
On 04/21/2017 03:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by gimple-fold.c transforming s{,n}printf
calls with a plain "%s" format string into strcpy regardless of
whether they are valid well before the -Wformtat-overflow wa
Bug 77671 - missing -Wformat-overflow warning on sprintf overflow
with "%s", is caused by gimple-fold.c transforming s{,n}printf
calls with a plain "%s" format string into strcpy regardless of
whether they are valid well before the -Wformtat-overflow warning
has had a chance to validate them.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
