On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 01/15/2018 07:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> OK.
>
> Thanks. I keep forgetting to get approval to backport these
> simple bug fixes. Is this one okay for the 7 and 6 branches?
Yes.
Jason
On 01/15/2018 07:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. I keep forgetting to get approval to backport these
simple bug fixes. Is this one okay for the 7 and 6 branches?
Martin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch fixes PR c++/83588 - struct with two f
OK.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The attached patch fixes PR c++/83588 - struct with two flexible
> arrays causes an internal compiler error. The ICE is caused by
> the same assertion in varasm.c that has led to other similar
> reports in the past:
>
> /* Given a non-
The attached patch fixes PR c++/83588 - struct with two flexible
arrays causes an internal compiler error. The ICE is caused by
the same assertion in varasm.c that has led to other similar
reports in the past:
/* Given a non-empty initialization, this field had better
be last. Given a fl
