On 05/03/2017 05:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
He does, albeit in a coding way I dislike (watch how the iterator
update is done in the condition!)
Sorry you dislike that. I've used that kind of loop idiom, since for ever
though.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> This loop in ggc-page confused me, because the iterator is one greater than
>> the indexing value. Also the formatting of the array indexing is incorrect.
>>
>> Fixed thusly, and appli
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> This loop in ggc-page confused me, because the iterator is one greater than
> the indexing value. Also the formatting of the array indexing is incorrect.
>
> Fixed thusly, and applied as obvious after booting on x86_64-linux-gnu
- for (i =
This loop in ggc-page confused me, because the iterator is one greater than the
indexing value. Also the formatting of the array indexing is incorrect.
Fixed thusly, and applied as obvious after booting on x86_64-linux-gnu
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
2017-05-02 Nathan Sidwell
* ggc-pa