[PATCH] gcc: middle-end opt for trigonometric pi-based functions builtins

2025-06-02 Thread Yuao Ma
Hi Joseph, > I don't see tests for the various special cases from Annex F (for example, > "tanpi(n) returns +0, for positive even and negative odd integers n." and > "tanpi(n) returns -0, for positive odd and negative even integers n."). > In such cases the sign of zero would need to be checked sp

Re: [PATCH] gcc: middle-end opt for trigonometric pi-based functions builtins

2025-06-02 Thread Tobias Burnus
Joseph Myers wrote: On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Yuao Ma wrote: For MPFR versions older than 4.2.0, we've included our own folding functions. I think the normal practice in GCC would be to avoid the optimizations when the MPFR support is absent, instead of working around the absence with possibly less a

Re: [PATCH] gcc: middle-end opt for trigonometric pi-based functions builtins

2025-06-02 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Yuao Ma wrote: > For MPFR versions older than 4.2.0, we've included our own folding functions. I think the normal practice in GCC would be to avoid the optimizations when the MPFR support is absent, instead of working around the absence with possibly less accurate implementa

[PATCH] gcc: middle-end opt for trigonometric pi-based functions builtins

2025-06-01 Thread Yuao Ma
Hello world, This patch partially handled PR118592. This patch builds upon r16-710-g591d3d02664c7b and r16-711-g89935d56f768b4. It introduces middle-end optimizations, such as constant folding, for our trigonometric pi-based function built-ins. For MPFR versions older than 4.2.0, we've included