Hi Bernhard,
For Fortran identifiers, that would be really good. Would you do that?
Is it really needed?
We do not enter internal helper names (class names, anything
artificial, anything leading underscore or leading uppercase) to the
suggestions proposals so should never actually recommend a
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:55 +0200
Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> > Bernhard> Yes, this is probably OK although Fortran is case-
> > Bernhard> insensitive. I think we lowercase names coming in from the
> > Bernhard> source (at least for the internal identifier nodes), so we
> > Bernhard> shou
Hi Tom,
Bernhard> Yes, this is probably OK although Fortran is case-
Bernhard> insensitive. I think we lowercase names coming in from the
Bernhard> source (at least for the internal identifier nodes), so we
Bernhard> should not be affected by any case change.
I already checked it in, but FWIW i
Bernhard> Yes, this is probably OK although Fortran is case-
Bernhard> insensitive. I think we lowercase names coming in from the
Bernhard> source (at least for the internal identifier nodes), so we
Bernhard> should not be affected by any case change.
I already checked it in, but FWIW it would be
On 5 June 2020 17:12:58 CEST, Thomas Koenig via Fortran
wrote:
>Hi Tom,
>
>> My earlier patch to add case handling to the spell checker caused a
>> Fortran regression. I believe I must have misread the test results.
>>
>> This patch fixes the problem by changing the cutoff. I chose this
>> val
Hi Tom,
My earlier patch to add case handling to the spell checker caused a
Fortran regression. I believe I must have misread the test results.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the cutoff. I chose this
value because the previous patch effectively multiplied the result of
get_edit_dist
My earlier patch to add case handling to the spell checker caused a
Fortran regression. I believe I must have misread the test results.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the cutoff. I chose this
value because the previous patch effectively multiplied the result of
get_edit_distance by 2 (
