On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 12:26:46PM +, Sudakshina Das wrote:
> >
> I am observing your new test pr88328.f90 failing on
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf:
> Excess errors:
> /build/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_9.f90:20:36: Error:
> Invalid kind for REAL at (1)
> /build/src/gcc/gcc/tests
Hi Steve
On 21/12/18 8:01 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 07:39:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> scalbln(double x, long n)
>>> {
>>>
>>> return (scalbn(x, (n > NMAX) ? NMAX : (n < NMIN) ? NMIN : (int)n));
>>> }
>>>
>>> A se
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 07:39:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > scalbln(double x, long n)
> > {
> >
> > return (scalbn(x, (n > NMAX) ? NMAX : (n < NMIN) ? NMIN : (int)n));
> > }
> >
> > A search for glibc's libm locates https://tinyurl.com/yb
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Steve Kargl wrote:
> scalbln(double x, long n)
> {
>
> return (scalbn(x, (n > NMAX) ? NMAX : (n < NMIN) ? NMIN : (int)n));
> }
>
> A search for glibc's libm locates https://tinyurl.com/ybcy8w4t
> which is a bit-twiddling routine. Not sure it's worth the
> effort. J
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:59:04PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 7:59 PM Steve Kargl <
> >
> > D.3853 = *i;
> > __result_foo = scalbnq (c,
> > (integer(kind=4)) MAX_EXPR ,
> > -2147483647>);
> >
> > The range [-32443,32443] is a subset of [-huge(),huge(0)].
> >
>
> Tr
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 7:59 PM Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:07:08AM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:22 AM Steve Kargl <
> > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:47:39PM -0
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > No, I'm adding the missing functions to the INTERFACE.
>
> Ah, I see. What I missed was that the function is actually translated
> to something else.
>
> So, OK for trunk, and thanks for the patch!
>
Janne, Thomas
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:07:08AM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:22 AM Steve Kargl <
> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:47:39PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > The attached patch has been tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
> > >
> > >
Hi Steve,
No, I'm adding the missing functions to the INTERFACE.
Ah, I see. What I missed was that the function is actually translated
to something else.
So, OK for trunk, and thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:07:08AM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:22 AM Steve Kargl <
> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:47:39PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > The attached patch has been tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 8:22 AM Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:47:39PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > The attached patch has been tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
> >
> > OK to commit?
> >
> > 2018-12-20 Steven G. Kargl
> >
> > PR fortran/69
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:47:39PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> The attached patch has been tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
>
> OK to commit?
>
> 2018-12-20 Steven G. Kargl
>
> PR fortran/69121
> * libgfortran/ieee/ieee_arithmetic.F90: Provide missing functions
> in interface for
The attached patch has been tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
It provides the missing pieces for IEEE_SCALB to allow
it to be generic function. Briefly, when FX contributed
IEEE_SCALB, he implemented a casting of the integer
argument to the default integer kind. For integer(1)
and integer(2), this is
13 matches
Mail list logo
