> Whoops, sorry about that. As you can see I have small patches
> sitting in my tree. I tried to untangle the 'svn diff’
Thanks for cleaning and submitting those! I’ll try to review them over the next
2 days, if nobody beats me to it :)
FX
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:45:54PM +0200, FX wrote:
> - You're missing the match.c part of the patch (I really had
> a hard time figuring out how the patch was supposed to work!
> then I read the one posted in the PR)
Whoops, sorry about that. As you can see I have small patches
sitting in my
- You’re missing the match.c part of the patch (I really had a hard time
figuring out how the patch was supposed to work! then I read the one posted in
the PR)
- Let’s avoid the strcmp() string comparison and use “op == INTRINSIC_NONE” as
the condition (seems clearer and more efficient to me)
Regression tested on trunk. OK to commit?
The patch allows gfortran to check a portion of C1202
that was previously mishandled.
2015-05-XX Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66057
* interface.c(gfc_match_end_interface): Enfornce F2008 C1202 (R1201).
2015-05-XX Steven G. Kargl
