Re: [PATCH] fix vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd generation

2011-05-19 Thread Quentin Neill
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > >> This patch fixes an obvious problem: the fma4_fmsubadd/fma4_fmaddsub >> instruction templates don't generate vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd because >> they don't use >> >> This passes bootstrap on x86_64 on trunk.  Okay to commit? > > Se

Re: [PATCH] fix vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd generation

2011-05-18 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > This patch fixes an obvious problem: the fma4_fmsubadd/fma4_fmaddsub > instruction templates don't generate vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd because > they don't use > > This passes bootstrap on x86_64 on trunk. Okay to commit? See comments in the code. > BTW, I'm testing on gcc-4_6-branch. S

[PATCH] fix vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd generation

2011-05-17 Thread Quentin Neill
This patch fixes an obvious problem: the fma4_fmsubadd/fma4_fmaddsub instruction templates don't generate vfmsubaddpd/vfmaddsubpd because they don't use This passes bootstrap on x86_64 on trunk. Okay to commit? BTW, I'm testing on gcc-4_6-branch. Should I post a different patch thread, or just