Hi,
On 07/27/2013 01:07 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- Original Message -
On 07/26/2013 08:42 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
Sure, I can do that. For maximum effectiveness, it'd be good to have it
check the specializations for atomic<>, too. Is there something in the
libstdc++ testsuite for iter
- Original Message -
> On 07/26/2013 08:42 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > Sure, I can do that. For maximum effectiveness, it'd be good to have it
> > check the specializations for atomic<>, too. Is there something in the
> > libstdc++ testsuite for iterating template instantiations over a li
Hi,
On 07/26/2013 08:42 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
Sure, I can do that. For maximum effectiveness, it'd be good to have it check the
specializations for atomic<>, too. Is there something in the libstdc++
testsuite for iterating template instantiations over a list of types, or do I have to
roll
Sure, I can do that. For maximum effectiveness, it'd be good to have it check
the specializations for atomic<>, too. Is there something in the libstdc++
testsuite for iterating template instantiations over a list of types, or do I
have to roll the list myself?
Thanks,
-Nathan
- Original
Hi,
Nathan Froyd ha scritto:
>Compiling the test program:
>
>#include
>
>enum x { a, b };
>
>std::atomic v;
>
>bool test_strong()
>{
> x expected = a;
>return v.compare_exchange_strong(expected, b,
>std::memory_order_acq_rel);
>}
>
>bool test_weak()
>{
> x expected = a;
>return v.compare_exc
Compiling the test program:
#include
enum x { a, b };
std::atomic v;
bool test_strong()
{
x expected = a;
return v.compare_exchange_strong(expected, b, std::memory_order_acq_rel);
}
bool test_weak()
{
x expected = a;
return v.compare_exchange_weak(expected, b, std::memory_order_acq_re
