Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Law
] fix for pr 57474 On 05/31/2013 06:28 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Hello Everyone, PR reports that sec_implicit2 and sec_implicit regression tests were failing in darwin. I looked into it and it is due to an uninitialized variable (rhs_length). This patch pasted below should fix that issue

RE: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-06-03 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law > Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:51 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; domi...@lps.ens.fr > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for p

Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-06-03 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/31/2013 06:28 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Hello Everyone, PR reports that sec_implicit2 and sec_implicit regression tests were failing in darwin. I looked into it and it is due to an uninitialized variable (rhs_length). This patch pasted below should fix that issue. Is this OK for

RE: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-06-01 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: Dominique Dhumieres [mailto:domi...@lps.ens.fr] > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:35 AM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: domi...@lps.ens.fr > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474 > > > ... This patch pasted

Re: [PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-05-31 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
> ... This patch pasted below should fix that issue. ... A quick test on darwin (no bootstrap, no full regtest) with make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="cilk-plus.exp --target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'" gives === gcc Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes2904

[PATCH] fix for pr 57474

2013-05-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, PR reports that sec_implicit2 and sec_implicit regression tests were failing in darwin. I looked into it and it is due to an uninitialized variable (rhs_length). This patch pasted below should fix that issue. Is this OK for trunk? Here are the ChangeLog entries: 2013-05